Financial Times EMBA Ranking 2023: Global Executive MBA among International Top 45 for the Fourth Time

The Financial Times (FT) Executive MBA (EMBA) Ranking, perhaps the most prestigious ranking of the year, just placed WU’s Global Executive MBA 45^th among the 100 programs ranked, which means it has been designated one of the world’s best 45 MBA programs for the fourth time in a row. In the “international course experience” category, the WU Executive Academy’s flagship program even reached 6^th place.

Ahead of this year’s ranking, the Financial Times had reacted to years of criticism of the assessment criteria (“salary today” and “salary increase” used to make up about 40% of the total result) by updating its methodology and adding a new category: the business schools’ carbon footprints.

The FT EMBA Ranking has been considered the Champions League of globally leading business schools for many years. Only a minuscule percentage of MBA programs offered worldwide manage to meet the FT’s demanding criteria to enter the ranking, which is why people considering MBA studies pay as much attention to its results as to leading international accreditations. 

The most important MBA ranking of the year is once again dominated by the usual suspects: Kellogg/HKUST EMBA (#1) and Ceibs Global EMBA (#2). The third place, however, is a premiere: the EMBA of the ESCP Business School has entered the winners’ rostrum for the first time.

The Global Executive MBA was ranked 6^th worldwide in the “international course experience” category (# 2 in the EU, #1 in Germany/Austria/Switzerland), faring even better than the London Business School (# 39) or the IE Business School (# 12), which both placed among the top 10, and 15^th in “career progress” (# 5 in the EU, #3 in Germany/Austria/Switzerland).

The FT Ranking is based on an elaborate process in the course of which close to 20 criteria are thoroughly examined, primarily focusing on graduates’ salary and career development as well as program quality. For the results, the various criteria, which are divided into the three overarching themes of “career development,” “diversity,” and “research/ESG/carbon footprint,” are weighted in different ways. The majority of data is directly collected from alumni. The remaining data, mainly quantitative data on participants, faculty members, program content, research activities, and sustainability efforts are provided by the business schools.

This year, the Financial Times has changed its weighting scheme for the first time in many years: While both income-related categories, “salary today” and “salary three years after completing the MBA,” made up 40% in the past, they now account for only 33%. At the same time, categories of the “diversity” field were assigned more weight (28% compared to 26% before), and the entirely new category of “school carbon footprint rank” was added. The latter is calculated based on the business school’s target year for reaching zero emissions and a publicly available carbon emissions audit report not older than three years. This category will make up 4% of the overall result in the future.

“This was a very smart decision in our opinion. Diversity and sustainability are so essential for our future. It’s great to see this finally reflected in the ranking,” Stöttinger says.

View the Financial Times Executive MBA Ranking 2023

What the Financial Times EMBA Ranking tells MBA Students

Join 15,000 + professionals and get regular updates on leadership and management topics. Learn something new every time.